(925) 952-9880
  Livingston Lawyers
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Renée Welze Livingston
    • Craig A. Livingston
    • Crystal L. Van Der Putten
    • John C. Hentschel
    • J. Jasmine Jenkins
    • Paralegals
  • What we do
    • Catastrophic Injury & Wrongful Death
    • Product Liability
    • Trucking & Transportation
    • General & Premises Liability
    • Prop 65
    • Appellate
    • Construction
    • Real Estate & Disability Access Litigation
    • Business & Commercial
  • What's New
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Renée Welze Livingston
    • Craig A. Livingston
    • Crystal L. Van Der Putten
    • John C. Hentschel
    • J. Jasmine Jenkins
    • Paralegals
  • What we do
    • Catastrophic Injury & Wrongful Death
    • Product Liability
    • Trucking & Transportation
    • General & Premises Liability
    • Prop 65
    • Appellate
    • Construction
    • Real Estate & Disability Access Litigation
    • Business & Commercial
  • What's New
  • Contact

what's new

LLF Wins Summary Judgment for Commercial Developers under Privette Doctrine

11/9/2021

 
Picture
​LLF Shareholders Renée Welze Livingston and Crystal L. Van Der Putten successfully argued to a Santa Clara County judge that plaintiffs were precluded from proceeding against two commercial real estate landowners for catastrophic injuries sustained by an employee of the refrigeration subcontractor during a renovation project. Relying on the holding in Privette v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 689, the defendants argued that the employee of an independent contractor should not be allowed to recover damages from the contractor’s hirer, and the exclusive remedy for the employee was in workers’ compensation. Plaintiffs argued that one exception to the Privette doctrine applied, namely, that a landowner may be liable to a contractor’s employee when the defendants knew or reasonably should have known of a concealed, preexisting hazardous condition on its premises, of which the contractor did not know, and failed to warn the contractor of it. The court, in Lopez v. S.B.C.C., Inc. et al., Case No. 17CV314841, concluded that under the various contracts between the parties, the contractors were responsible for conducting inspections to determine worksite safety, especially after receiving notice from the landowners of possible structural problems in the area where the employee was injured.
Picture

    Archives

    February 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017

    Categories

    All
    About Us
    Happenings
    News
    Seminars

 Livingston Law Firm  - 1600 South Main Street,  Suite 280,  Walnut Creek, CA 94596   
Telephone:  (925) 952-9880 ​  Facsimile::  (925) 952-9881